Brazilian Philanthropy Forum 2026: Between essence and reinvention

The 15th edition of the Brazilian Philanthropy Forum took place on August 27 in São Paulo. Organized by IDIS, the event brings together leaders and experts to strengthen philanthropy in Brazil, foster connections, and encourage the development of solutions to social challenges. 

 

Brazilian Philanthropy Forum 2026: Between essence and reinvention

 

With the theme Between essence and reinvention, the Forum’s sessions addressed issues such as the power of territories, new architectures for cultural, territorial, and socio-environmental financing, equity and persistent inequalities, impact and shared value creation, as well as different perspectives on Latin American and family philanthropy. Throughout the day, 314 guests attended the event, while the livestream reached nearly 5,000 views. 

The program featured 13 sessions across 10 hours of programming, with 56 speakers. Among those taking part were Conceição Evaristo (Casa Escrevivência Conceição Evaristo), Belisa Maggi (Fundação AMAGGI and Instituto Signativo), Claudia Calais (Fundação Bunge), Eliana Sousa Silva (Redes da Maré), Michael França (Insper), Nick Tedesco (National Center for Family Philanthropy), Somachi Chris-Asoluka (Tony Elumelu Foundation), Valcléia dos Santos (Fundação Amazônia Sustentável), and Vitor Hugo Neia (Fundação Grupo Volkswagen). 

The program opened with a performance by the Orquestra Maré do Amanhã, bringing the strength and potential of local territories to the stage. Next, Conceição Evaristo, writer and founder of Casa Escrevivência Conceição Evaristo, led the Forum’s first reflection in the session “What needs to remain when everything changes?”. In a speech marked by sensitivity and depth, the writer invited the audience to reflect on what should be preserved amid transformation and on the values that underpin the construction of fairer and more inclusive futures. 

 

Panel ‘What needs to remain when everything changes?’

 

The first plenary, “Reinvention now. Relevance always!”, explored ways for philanthropy to adapt to a changing world without losing sight of its purpose. The discussion highlighted the importance of rethinking practices, strategies, and approaches so that philanthropic organizations and initiatives can maintain their relevance and expand their ability to generate social impact. 

Next, the plenary “The power of territories: When essence guides reinvention” placed at the center of the debate the importance of recognizing the specific characteristics, knowledge, and potential present in each territory. The discussion reinforced how listening and local leadership can guide new approaches and strengthen initiatives capable of promoting transformations that are more closely connected to the realities and needs of communities. 

The session “1% Commitment: The journey to joining the movement” highlighted the experiences of companies that have committed to allocating at least 1% of their net profits to social and environmental initiatives. The discussion demonstrated how joining the movement, which now has 30 signatories, can strengthen corporate social investment, bringing business practices closer to positive-impact strategies and contributing to a private sector that is increasingly engaged with society’s challenges. 

In parallel sessions, participants explored different perspectives on the challenges and possibilities of reinvention in philanthropy. “Capital in reinvention: New architectures for cultural, territorial, and socio-environmental financing” discussed new ways of mobilizing and directing resources, while “Reinventing equity: New responses to persistent inequalities” explored strategies for addressing historical inequalities and developing more effective and inclusive responses. 

Closing the morning program, the thematic lunch provided opportunities for exchange and deeper discussion. At each table, a host facilitated a conversation around one of the 20 proposed themes, broadening reflections on different issues related to philanthropy and social investment. 

The program continued with a Dynamic Session, bringing new perspectives on the landscape of Artificial Intelligence in the social sector and on funding opportunities—both key elements in philanthropy’s ongoing reinvention. The session featured reflections by Célia Cruz, Visiting Fellow at the Skoll Centre, and Pedro Barros, co-founder of Sul – Intelligence for Impact, both members of the AI for Impact Coalition. 

In the traditional “In conversation with…” interview, Paula Fabiani, CEO of IDIS, spoke with Denise Aguiar, Managing Director of Bradesco Foundation, who shared her personal story and her perspective on the paths of philanthropy, the challenges of the present, and the importance of strengthening an approach committed to lasting social transformation. 

 

Panel ‘In conversation with…’

 

In the panel “Impact that creates value: When data strengthens business and society”, participants discussed how the strategic use of data can help understand results, guide decision-making, and enhance the impact of initiatives. The conversation highlighted the importance of turning information into knowledge to generate value for both businesses and society. 

In parallel sessions, participants further explored the role of different actors in philanthropy. “Latin American Philanthropy: Pathways to a shared future” reflected on the challenges and opportunities for strengthening philanthropic action across the region, while “Family Philanthropy: Local roots, lasting transformations” explored the role of families in building initiatives connected to local territories and capable of generating long-term impact. 

The program also featured the 2025 winners of the Social Entrepreneur Award, who presented their initiatives, journeys, and the purpose behind their work. 

Finally, the closing plenary, “The future is a choice, not a destiny”, reflected on the role of our choices in shaping the future we want. The discussion reinforced that the path toward a fairer and more sustainable society is not predetermined, but built through the decisions, commitments, and actions we take today. 

 

Explore the full program. 

“Reinvention does not mean breaking away from everything that came before. Sometimes, reinventing means finding new ways to honor what has always driven us: a commitment to the common good, reducing inequalities, strengthening civil society, and building a fairer and more sustainable world.”

— Paula Fabiani, in her closing remarks”

 

Watch the full recording of the event: 

 

Organization and Support 

The Brazilian Philanthropy Forum is an initiative of IDIS – Institue for the Development of Social Investment, Charities Aid Foundation (CAF), and Global Philanthropy Forum (GPF).  The Forum counts on Strategic Partne’s from Movimento Bem Maior and Fundação Bradesco; Gold Partner from RD Saúde; Silver Partner from Fundação Sicredi; Bronze Partner´s from Fundação ArcelorMittal, Fundação Grupo Volkswagen, Levisky Legado, and Instituto Sicoob; Institutional Partne’s from Fundo de Fomento à Filantropia and UNICEF. Media Partners are Alliance Magazine and Stanford Social Innovation Review Brasil.

The future is a choice, not a destiny

By Letícia Santos, Project Analyst at IDIS 

Building the future is an act of choice, and making choices requires naming what we want to change, having the courage to make public commitments, and being willing to engage in difficult conversations. These were the issues at the heart of the discussion between Nicholas Tedesco, President and CEO of National Center for Family Philanthropy (NCFP); Rodrigo Pipponzi, Member of the Social Impact Committee at RD Saúde and co-founder of Commitment 1%; and Michael França, Coordinator of the Racial Studies Center at Insper, during the closing panel of the 2026 Brazilian Philanthropy Forum, moderated by Paula Fabiani, CEO of IDIS. 

Nicholas Tedesco, President and CEO of National Center for Family Philanthropy (NCFP)

For Nicholas, representing family philanthropy, courage begins by questioning the motivation behind a philanthropic legacy. Drawing on his experience in contexts where a culture of giving is already well established, Nicholas notes that families give, but do not always ask why, for what purpose, or what they want to endure. 

Reimagining family philanthropy means creating space to question what should be preserved and what needs to change. Nicholas argues that we are in a period of transformation in which purpose must go hand in hand with current needs while anticipating those of the future. This means building governance structures that can sustain choices over time and creating conditions for different generations to come together around a common agenda. 

In the United States, Nicholas shared that many families have increasingly directed their support toward democracy and efforts to address the climate crisis, but he emphasized that this process requires conversations about power and privilege that the field still tends to avoid. 

In Brazil, the challenge comes earlier, as the involvement of wealthy families in philanthropy is still incipient and poorly documented, as highlighted in the report Paths to a Broader and More Strategic Action in Family Philanthropy in Brazil, produced by IDIS. According to data from the GIFE Census, in 2024, family foundations and institutes invested R$395 million, equivalent to approximately 7% of the total mapped by the census. 

Turning to the social role of businesses, Rodrigo Pipponzi focused his remarks on the courage to make public commitments and uphold them over time. RD Saúde chose not to create a separate institute, meaning that the company’s business mission and social commitment are treated as one and the same. This is reflected, for example, in allocating a percentage of net profit to social investment, as a signatory to Commitment 1%, a collaborative initiative between IDIS and Instituto MOL that seeks to encourage companies to donate to civil society organizations. 

Other ways the company has sought to align its business with its role in society include linking executive bonuses to ESG targets and involving senior leadership in the Social Impact Committee. Finally, Rodrigo emphasized that corporate philanthropy plays a catalytic role, with mobilization now being one of RD Saúde’s strengths. One example is the ‘round-up for charity’ initiative, which raises between R$4 million and R$5 million every year for civil society organizations in Brazil. 

Paula Fabiani, CEO at IDIS

Prompted by Paula Fabiani to discuss how inequality affects Brazilian society and the role of philanthropy in this context, Michael França, representing academia, brought questions to the table that the field rarely addresses in depth. Referring to his recently published book Os Custos das Desigualdades: uma carta às elites econômicas [The Costs of Inequalities: a letter to the economic elites], co-authored with Daniel Duque and published by Editora Jandaíra, Michael argued that in a society that is among the most unequal in the world, the externalities produced by inequality are not always sufficiently addressed, making it harder to break cycles of inequality and narrowing the range of possible futures. 

Reinventing philanthropy, in this sense, also means recognizing what it still fails to see. Michael spoke about his decision not to keep this knowledge confined to academic circles, instead bringing data and evidence into public debate and dialogue with governments. For philanthropy, he emphasizes that education alone cannot solve everything, and that transforming Brazilian society must extend beyond the walls of schools. 

The conversation that followed with the audience deepened critical aspects of the current debate, revealing that the questions raised by the three speakers resonated beyond the stage. The first question, about the role of philanthropy in the face of denialism, elicited complementary responses from Michael França and Nicholas Tedesco. Michael pointed to a structural asymmetry in philanthropy as a driver of knowledge production: international funding tends to place greater trust in researchers and provide long-term institutional support, while in Brazil, funding tends to be more restricted, geared toward confirming hypotheses and answering narrowly defined questions. Nicholas added, based on his experience in the United States, that universities are seen as reference centers for disseminating philanthropic best practices and developing leaders — a role that is still being consolidated in Brazil. 

The second question opened a discussion about collaboration among foundations, organizations, and smaller businesses. Nicholas said there is no magic formula, but that in the United States there is a growing recognition of the need to collaborate, even though some reluctance remains. For him, addressing the root causes of problems is only possible through systemic change, and systemic change requires collaboration. Pipponzi reinforced this argument from a business perspective, emphasizing that companies need to be willing to relinquish power and certain deeply held convictions in order to work together with communities and other actors, creating incentives for collaboration. 

Rodrigo Pipponzi, Member of the Social Impact Committee at RD Saúde

In their closing remarks, each speaker offered a synthesis that echoed the theme of the panel. Pipponzi emphasized that building the future we want requires the courage to make choices and sustain them over time. Michael proposed thinking about legacy as a way of reducing social distances, maintaining integrity between philanthropic and business roles. Nicholas concluded with an invitation to keep spaces like the Forum alive, so that conversations like this can remain open. 

Check ou the full panel:

Latin American Philanthropy: pathways toward a common future

By Carla Irrazabal, Project Analyst at IDIS

Latin American identity seems to be increasingly visible. And this is not only because of the success of Latin music on Spotify and around the world. There is something that connects us and defines us, something that cannot be ignored. Perhaps the uncertainty of a world marked by conflict and the need to affirm identities have helped bring these shared characteristics to the center of the conversation. 

Panel ‘Latin American Philanthropy: Pathways Toward a Common Future’

We have much in common, both in characteristics that could become trends and strengths to be valued, and in the things we feel need to change. At the same time that we are one of the most unequal regions in the world, we see generosity expressed in many everyday actions that shape our communities. 

Our historical heritage, marked by colonization, Indigenous peoples, and the influence of the African diaspora forcibly brought to the region through slavery during the colonial period, shapes many of these characteristics. From Tierra del Fuego to Monterrey, we share histories, challenges, forms of solidarity, and a diversity that cannot be overlooked when we talk about Latin America. 

Bringing this perspective to philanthropy, the panel “Latin American Philanthropy: Pathways to a Shared Future”, held during the Brazilian Philanthropy Forum 2026, invited us to reflect on what unites us, what Latin American countries have in common, and which characteristics of our region can contribute to building a stronger, more autonomous, and more connected philanthropic field. 

The moderator, Guillermo Correa, Executive Director of Red Argentina para la Cooperación Internacional, opened the conversation by challenging participants to think about how to strengthen Latin American philanthropy without simply importing external models. The question ran throughout the entire panel: how can we expand collaboration among countries, strengthen our own capacities, and at the same time preserve the diversity and essence that characterize our ways of generating social and environmental impact? 

Cassio França, Secretary general of GIFE, brought the Brazilian experience as a starting point for thinking about broader characteristics of the region. He spoke about the weight of corporate philanthropy: among GIFE members, 60% are companies and 20% are families. 

This dynamic is reversed in the U.S. philanthropic landscape, where family philanthropy predominates. He raised a question about the role of family philanthropy in Latin America. In his view, it can bring something different to the field and create space for issues and causes that may not be as prominent in corporate philanthropy. The idea is not to choose between one form and another, but to recognize the contribution of different actors to building a more diverse ecosystem. 

His remarks also highlighted an important point about the environment needed for this field to grow stronger: the need for a more favorable legal framework for giving. In a region marked by concentrated resources and deep inequalities, strengthening a culture of giving also means discussing the instruments and policies that encourage or hinder the allocation of private resources to the public good. 

João Paulo Vergueiro (JP), Director of GivingTuesday’s Latin America and Caribbean Hub, brought a reflection on the different meanings of philanthropy to the conversation. Not only its literal meaning of “love of humanity”, associated with generosity, but also philanthropy understood as giving and as a field within civil society. Drawing on his experience at GivingTuesday, JP emphasized that generosity is already present in the everyday lives of Latin American countries. Solidarity and the willingness to help others are not necessarily something we need to create. The challenge is to recognize, structure, and strengthen these practices so that they can contribute more consistently to the philanthropic field. 

But to do so, we still know too little about the field itself. A seemingly simple question — “How many civil society organizations are there in the country?” — already reveals the lack of data and research in many parts of the region. For JP, gaining a better understanding of the field is essential to making more strategic decisions and strengthening civil society. 

The lack of data is also connected to an issue raised by Carolina Suárez, CEO of Latimpacto: the need to build greater trust in the Latin American social sector. She emphasized the importance of evidence, while also highlighting the need for balance. Many organizations do not have the same capacity to produce reports, indicators, and accountability materials in the formats required by funders. Without taking this reality into account, excessive requirements may divert resources away from precisely those organizations that are closest to the communities they serve. 

Carolina Suárez, CEO of Latimpacto

For Carolina, developing a model of our own for Latin America is essential. Examples and solutions do not necessarily lie in models imported from the United States or other contexts. Many of them already exist here, in local practices, civil society networks, forms of community solidarity, and the ability of territories to organize and collaborate. 

Carolina also highlighted the importance of building a Latin American identity. She noted that when people from African countries attend international conferences, they often say “I am African” rather than identifying primarily by their country of origin. We need to draw on this example and proudly affirm that we are Latin Americans. 

In a second round of questions, which were more direct and focused on practice, Guillermo asked participants specifically about how to move forward and what examples could serve as references. 

Cassio returned to the issue of the legal framework and emphasized the importance of instruments capable of encouraging a culture of giving and strengthening domestic resource mobilization. One of the references mentioned was India, where corporate social responsibility legislation requires companies that meet certain financial criteria to allocate at least 2% of their average net profit from the previous three years to corporate social responsibility initiatives. 

JP summarized part of the conversation in three words: narrative, data, and structure. The narrative is needed to tell the story of what the third sector already does and has been doing across Latin America. Data provides the inputs needed to understand the field strategically. And structure means strengthening the networks that already exist in Brazil and Mexico and are beginning to take shape in Colombia, through groups such as GIFE. 

Carolina concluded by emphasizing what may be one of Latin America’s greatest strengths: human capital. The ability to build relationships, mobilize people, work collaboratively, and develop solutions rooted in local territories is part of the region’s strength. For this potential to achieve greater scale, we will need to expand integration, trust, and pride in our shared identity. 

This conversation showed us that Latin American philanthropy does not need to “reinvent the wheel” or seek answers in ready-made models from the Global North. Our strength lies precisely in what already exists here and is deeply Latin American: generosity, solidarity, cultural diversity, and the strength and leadership of our communities. 

João Paulo Vergueiro | Director for Latin America and the Caribbean at GivingTuesday

The diversity of the continent, with its different histories, cultures, forms of organization, and ways of responding to local challenges, should not be a barrier to building a common agenda. On the contrary, it is an asset for developing solutions that are more closely connected to our realities. 

In a context of polycrisis, in which social, political, economic, and climate-related challenges overlap, strengthening our bonds as Latin American hermanos becomes even more important. Models and experiences have already been developed here. The path forward may lie precisely in learning more about what our neighbors are doing, sharing lessons, and strengthening this regional network, which still has enormous room to grow. 

Check ou the full panel: